<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coalition for Impartial Justice &#124; Impartial Courts Minnesota &#187; judicial elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impartialcourts.org/tag/judicial-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org</link>
	<description>Judges based on merit. Election based on performance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Influence of Big Money on the Wisconsin Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2009/11/05/the-influence-of-big-money-on-the-wisconsin-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2009/11/05/the-influence-of-big-money-on-the-wisconsin-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an editorial today, the Green Bay Press-Gazette, lays out some of the facts about how two Wisconsin Supremes got elected with the help of large donations, and then did not recuse themselves from cases involving their donors, or in the case of one justice, from a case involving her own spouse. Some at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an editorial today, the <em>Green Bay Press-Gazette</em>, lays out some of the facts about how two Wisconsin Supremes got elected with the help of large donations, and then did not recuse themselves from cases involving their donors, or in the case of one justice, from a case involving her own spouse. Some at the Wisconsin legislature propose public funding of judicial elections, but the newspaper just calls for disclosure of who actually is paying for all those attack ads.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20091105/GPG0602/911050648/1269/GPG06/Editorial--Big-money-always-finds-a-loophole" target="_blank">Read the editorial here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2009/11/05/the-influence-of-big-money-on-the-wisconsin-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

