<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesotans for Impartial Courts &#187; caperton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impartialcourts.org/tag/caperton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org</link>
	<description>Judges based on merit. Election based on performance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:14:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Court Watchers Predict ‘Deluge’ of Recusal Requests in Light of Caperton</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2009/07/02/court-watchers-predict-%e2%80%98deluge%e2%80%99-of-recusal-requests-in-light-of-caperton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2009/07/02/court-watchers-predict-%e2%80%98deluge%e2%80%99-of-recusal-requests-in-light-of-caperton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caperton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The American Bar Association Journal, June 11, 2009:
This week&#8217;s U.S. Supreme Court ruling that a West Virginia Supreme Court justice should have recused himself from a case involving a party that helped fund his campaign has lawyers across the country predicting a &#8220;deluge&#8221; of recusal requests.
Read the entire article here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From The American Bar Association Journal, June 11, 2009:</p>
<p>This week&#8217;s <a title="U.S. Supreme Court ruling" href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/supreme_court_big_judicial_contributions_required_recusal_of_w._va._judge/" target="_blank">U.S. Supreme Court ruling</a> that a West Virginia Supreme Court justice should have recused himself from a case involving a party that helped fund his campaign has lawyers across the country predicting a &#8220;deluge&#8221; of recusal requests.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/court_watchers_predict_deluge_of_recusal_requests_in_light_of_caperton/" target="_blank">entire article here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2009/07/02/court-watchers-predict-%e2%80%98deluge%e2%80%99-of-recusal-requests-in-light-of-caperton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
