<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesotans for Impartial Courts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impartialcourts.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org</link>
	<description>Judges based on merit. Election based on performance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Think-tank presidents shared perspective on improving judicial elections</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/think-tank-presidents-shared-perspective-on-improving-judicial-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/think-tank-presidents-shared-perspective-on-improving-judicial-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitch Pearlstein, President of the Center of the American Experiment, and Dane Smith, President of Growth &#38; Justice, joined together in a March 7, Star Tribune Op-Ed  supporting retention elections over judicial races.  These organizations, one conservative and one progressive, are members of the Coalition for Impartial Justice Minnesota.  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch Pearlstein, President of the Center of the American Experiment, and Dane Smith, President of Growth &amp; Justice, joined together in a March 7, Star Tribune <a href="http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentary/86674772.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUsZ">Op-Ed  </a>supporting retention elections over judicial races.  These organizations, one conservative and one progressive, are members of the <a href="http://mnbar.org/impartialjustice/Supporters.asp">Coalition for Impartial Justice Minnesota.  </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/think-tank-presidents-shared-perspective-on-improving-judicial-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 7 Star Tribune: support for Judicial Retention Elections</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/march-7-star-tribune-support-for-judicial-retention-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/march-7-star-tribune-support-for-judicial-retention-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Star Tribune Editorial:  In judicial reform:  a vote for retention  talks about the all-star lineup of GOP and DFL supporters at last week&#8217;s House State and Local Government Operations Committee hearing and the reasons to get the Judicial Retention Amendment on the 2010 ballot.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Star Tribune Editorial:  <a href="http://www.startribune.com/opinion/editorials/86676147.html?elr=KArks7PYDiaK7DUoaK7D_V_eDc87DUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU">In judicial reform:  a vote for retention</a>  talks about the all-star lineup of GOP and DFL supporters at last week&#8217;s House State and Local Government Operations Committee hearing and the reasons to get the Judicial Retention Amendment on the 2010 ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/march-7-star-tribune-support-for-judicial-retention-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winona Daily News Commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/winona-daily-news-commentary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/winona-daily-news-commentary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[League of Women Voters MN Commentary:  Support for Judicial Election Reform
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>League of Women Voters MN <a href="http://www.winonadailynews.com/news/opinion/article_5731a7e8-2964-11df-8e21-001cc4c03286.html">Commentary</a>:  Support for Judicial Election Reform</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/08/winona-daily-news-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>H.F. 224 Passes House Committee</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/04/h-f-224-passes-house-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/04/h-f-224-passes-house-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
On Thursday, March 4, the State and Local Government Operations Reform, Technology and Elections Committee voted 14 to 4 to pass House File 224 (Simon), the proposed constitutional amendment that would preserve the independence of Minnesota judges by creating a system of retention elections. 
Committee members who voted to support H.F. 224 were Representatives Pelowski, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">On <strong>Thursday, March 4,</strong> the State and Local Government Operations Reform, Technology and Elections Committee voted 14 to 4 to pass House File 224 (Simon), the proposed constitutional amendment that would preserve the independence of Minnesota judges by creating a system of retention elections. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Committee members who voted to support H.F. 224 were Representatives Pelowski, Poppe, P. Anderson, Gottwalt, Hilty, Hornstein, Kahn, Kalin, Marquart, Nelson, Sanders, Simon, Sterner, and Winkler.  The bill was referred to the House Civil Justice Committee. </span> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"><strong>What’s next?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"> </span></p>
<ul type="DISC">
<li><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Hearing in the </span><a href="http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/committee.asp?comm=86128" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; color: #0000ff; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">House Civil Justice Committee</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"> (date to be determined).</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Committee stops in </span><a href="http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/committees/committee_bio.php?cmte_id=1017&amp;ls=86" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; color: #0000ff; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Senate Rules and Administration</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"> and </span><a href="http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/committees/committee_bio.php?cmte_id=1007&amp;ls=86" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; color: #0000ff; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Senate Finance</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"> (dates to be determined).</span></li>
</ul>
<p> <br />
<span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"><strong>What can you do?</strong></span> </p>
<ul type="DISC">
<li><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Call  or email legislators who supported H.F. 224 in Government Operations and thank them for their vote.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/committeemembers.asp?comm=86132" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; color: #0000ff; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">House State/Local Government Operations Committee members</span></span></a> </p>
<ul type="DISC">
<li><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Call or email House committee members urging them to support H.F. 224:</span> </li>
</ul>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/committeemembers.asp?comm=86128" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; color: #0000ff; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">House Civil Justice Committee members</span></span></a> </p>
<ul type="DISC">
<li><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Call or email Senate committee members asking them to support S.F. 70:</span> </li>
</ul>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/committees/committee_bio.php?cmte_id=1017&amp;ls=" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; color: #0000ff; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Senate Rules and Administration Committee Members</span></span></a> </p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/committees/committee_bio.php?cmte_id=1007&amp;ls=" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; color: #0000ff; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Senate Finance Committee Members</span></span></a> </p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.gis.leg.mn/mapserver/districts/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; color: #0000ff; font-family: Calibri;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Find your legislator.</span></span></a> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"><strong>Background:</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">The proposed constitutional amendment gives Minnesotans the chance to preserve the independence and impartiality of judges across the state.  The amendment would create a system in which citizens have the final say on whether a judge stays in office—while also providing voters with nonpartisan performance evaluations on each judge before Election Day.  </span> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">The Legislature decides whether Minnesota voters have the chance to change the state Constitution.  <strong>With</strong> <strong>the doors open for</strong> <strong>special-interest money in judicial elections, that means now is the time for lawmakers to act and put the amendment in the November 2010 ballot.</strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/04/h-f-224-passes-house-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMPORTANT REMINDER &#8211;  House State and Local Government Operations Committee Hearing &#8211; Thursday, March 4</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/02/important-reminder-house-state-and-local-government-operations-committee-hearing-thursday-march-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/02/important-reminder-house-state-and-local-government-operations-committee-hearing-thursday-march-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Supporters of Minnesotans for Impartial Courts.
Please join us along with our Coalition for Impartial Justice partners in supporting legislation to establish a ballot initiative in November 2010 to improve our system for selecting and electing judges.
HF224, is being heard in the House State and Local Government Operations Reform, Technology and Elections Committee this Thursday.   Here are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Supporters of Minnesotans for Impartial Courts.</p>
<p>Please join us along with our Coalition for Impartial Justice partners in supporting legislation to establish a ballot initiative in November 2010 to improve our system for selecting and electing judges.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/bills/billnum.asp?Billnumber=HF224&amp;ls_year=86&amp;session_year=2010&amp;session_number=0">HF224</a>, is being heard in the House State and Local Government Operations Reform, Technology and Elections Committee this Thursday.   Here are the details:</p>
<p>8:30 a.m. Thursday, March 4</p>
<p>200 State Office Building</p>
<p>We can make a difference by attending the hearing and making calls to <a href="http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/committeemembers.asp?comm=86132">committee members </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/03/02/important-reminder-house-state-and-local-government-operations-committee-hearing-thursday-march-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Moyers &#8220;Justice for Sale&#8221; on PBS Feb 19</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/24/bill-moyers-justice-for-sale-on-pbs-feb-19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/24/bill-moyers-justice-for-sale-on-pbs-feb-19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch or read the  30 minute February 19 segment of Bill Moyers Journal documenting the concern that is growing nationally for keeping money and politics out of the judicial selection process.  Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch or read the  30 minute February 19 segment of Bill Moyers Journal documenting the concern that is growing nationally for keeping money and politics out of the judicial selection process.  <a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02192010/watch.html">Part 1</a> <a href="http:// www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02192010/watch2.html">Part 2</a> <a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02192010/watch3.html">Part 3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/24/bill-moyers-justice-for-sale-on-pbs-feb-19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minneapolis StarTribune reports on Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor message to legislators</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/minneapolis-startribune-reports-on-sandra-day-oconnor-message-to-legislators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/minneapolis-startribune-reports-on-sandra-day-oconnor-message-to-legislators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor addressed legislators Wednesday and urged an end to contested judicial elections to keep money and politics out of Minnesota&#8217;s courts.  The recent Supreme Court decision allowing corporate spending only serves to make the issue more urgent.  Read Lori Sturdevant&#8217;s February 10 article.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor addressed legislators Wednesday and urged an end to contested judicial elections to keep money and politics out of Minnesota&#8217;s courts.  The recent Supreme Court decision allowing corporate spending only serves to make the issue more urgent.  Read Lori Sturdevant&#8217;s February 10 <a href="http://www.startribune.com/opinion/84065882.html">article.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/minneapolis-startribune-reports-on-sandra-day-oconnor-message-to-legislators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>St Paul Pioneer Press Editorial &#8220;How best to protect Rule of Law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/st-paul-pioneer-press-editorial-how-best-to-protect-rule-of-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/st-paul-pioneer-press-editorial-how-best-to-protect-rule-of-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 11 Pioneer Press lead editorial highlights issues and proposal to protect Minnesota&#8217;s Judiciary from threats of money and politics.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>February 11 Pioneer Press lead <a href="http://www.twincities.com/opinion/ci_14376079?nclick_check=1">editorial</a> highlights issues and proposal to protect Minnesota&#8217;s Judiciary from threats of money and politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/st-paul-pioneer-press-editorial-how-best-to-protect-rule-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MinnPost reports on Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor stop in Twin Cities to promote impartial courts.</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/minnpost-reports-on-sandra-day-oconnor-stop-in-twin-cities-to-promote-impartial-courts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/minnpost-reports-on-sandra-day-oconnor-stop-in-twin-cities-to-promote-impartial-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor stopped in the Twin Cities Wednesday, February 10, to talk about the need to preserve an impartial judiciary. MinnPost, February 11.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor stopped in the Twin Cities Wednesday, February 10, to talk about the need to preserve an impartial judiciary. <a href="http://www.minnpost.com/politicalagenda/2010/02/11/15850/retired_justice_sandra_day_oconnor_says_judicial_elections_must_remain_fair_unpoliticized">MinnPost, February </a>11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/02/11/minnpost-reports-on-sandra-day-oconnor-stop-in-twin-cities-to-promote-impartial-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Justice O’Connor Sees Ill in Election Finance Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/01/27/former-justice-o%e2%80%99connor-sees-ill-in-election-finance-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/01/27/former-justice-o%e2%80%99connor-sees-ill-in-election-finance-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impartialcourts.org/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the New York Times, former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor said last week’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was likely to create “an increasing problem for maintaining an independent judiciary.”
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/us/politics/27judge.html" target="_blank">From the New York Times</a>, former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor said last week’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was likely to create “an increasing problem for maintaining an independent judiciary.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impartialcourts.org/2010/01/27/former-justice-o%e2%80%99connor-sees-ill-in-election-finance-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
